Web Site Usability Questionnaire Comparison

 

URL of first “good” Web site reviewed: __https://www.masterofmalt.com/_____Nate Magnuson

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

This website features an easy to use and well thought out design that provides a pleasing experience for the customers.

Colors are unobtrusive, search bar contact info is very detailed.

 

 

 

URL of second “good” Web site reviewed: ____www.amazon.com___Dan Willford

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

Layout is ok. Useless ads are annoying and distract from the site. Waste of space at the bottom

of the page distracts from the overall feel and usability of this website.

 

 


URL of first “bad” Web site reviewed: ___http://www.gatesnfences.com/___Nate Magnuson

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

This website has a cluttered feel to it. Text is too small rattled with links some do nothing. Some links are reactive and some are not.

Only good part is the readable header. I feel sorry for the people who actually paid for the site. The only useable

section of this site is the contact information making is easy to complain to this business just how awful this site is

 

 

 

 

URL of second “bad” Web site reviewed: ___http://www.cameronsworld.net/__Dan Willford

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

Not sure the purpose of the site. Lots of random images that have no rime nor reason. Sections of this site cause physical discomfort.

The entire website appears to be a joke. My IQ has suffered irreversible damage after viewing this site.