Web Site Usability Questionnaire Comparison

 

URL of first “good” Web site reviewed: https://greatlakes.org/

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

·         My team member chose this website and believed that it was effective. After reviewing the site myself, I would have to agree completely. The site has a great color scheme, many photos, and loading times were spectacular. The only issue I noticed was that the homepage was a little empty and could have used more information.

 

 

 

 

 

URL of second “good” Web site reviewed: www.lynda.com

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

·         After reviewing this website, both my partner and I agreed that it was very well put together. It is visually appealing and everything functions as it should.

 

 


URL of first “bad” Web site reviewed: http://www.lingscars.com/

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

·         It’s not hard to believe that our feelings were mutual about this site, because every aspect of it needs serious work. The site was created to sell and lease vehicles, but I’m guessing it doesn’t get much business. I say this because of the way the home page is set up. It is very flashy, and distracts the viewer.

 

 

 

 

URL of second “bad” Web site reviewed: www.arngren.net

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

·         Arngren.net is a site that was created to sell a wide-variety of different objects. When I say wide, I mean WIDE! The home page has no scaling, which makes it difficult to follow. Everything just seems thrown together. My team member and I shared similar thoughts about the website.