Web Site Usability Questionnaire Comparison

 

URL of first “good” Web site reviewed: https://greatlakes.org/

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

·         I chose this website because I consider the Great Lakes to be a very important resource. I like everything about this website because it’s not too busy, the information is clear, concise and to the point.

 

 

 

 

 

URL of second “good” Web site reviewed: www.lynda.com

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

·         After reviewing this website, both my partner and I agreed that it was very well put together. It is visually appealing and everything functions as it should.

 

 


URL of first “bad” Web site reviewed: http://www.lingscars.com/

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

·         It’s not hard to believe that our feelings were mutual about this site, because every aspect of it needs serious work. The site was created to sell and lease vehicles, but I’m guessing it doesn’t get much business. I say this because of the way the home page is set up. It is very flashy, and distracts the viewer.

 

 

 

 

URL of second “bad” Web site reviewed: www.arngren.net

 

Please note any differences of opinion about this Web site between team members.

 

·         Arngren.net is a site that was created to sell a wide-variety of different objects. When I say wide, I mean WIDE! The home page has no scaling, which makes it difficult to follow. Everything just seems thrown together. My team member and I shared similar thoughts about the website.